Replies to post #335685 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[SoxFan]

It's not as it's not viable. It's a fetus not a baby.

[fuagf]

topdawg tdr/rooster, If you are against killing zygotes (babies to you) you must support birth control. See

dropdeadfred, Abortion Isn’t a Necessary Evil. It’s Great

[...]

Without Birth Control:

* Out of 100 fertile women without birth control, 100 of them will ovulate in any given month.
* Out of those 100 released eggs, 33 will become fertilized.
* Out of those 33, 18% will be rejected by the uterus.
* In a group of 100 women not on birth control: 6 zygotes will “die”

With Birth Control:

* Out of 100 fertile women on birth control, around 6 of them will ovulate in any given month.
* Out of those 6 released eggs, only 2 will become fertilized.
* Out of those 2, 100% will be rejected by the uterus.
* In a group of 100 women on birth control: 2 zygotes will “die”

So let’s get this straight, taking birth control makes a woman’s body LESS likely to dispel fertilized eggs. If you believe that life begins at conception, shouldn’t it be your moral duty to reduce the number of zygote “abortions?” If you believe that a zygote is a human, you actually kill more babies by refusing to take birth control.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=152199719

That's some relevant science for you. Your 'saving life' claim is nothing but a furphy in your agenda to restrict the female right to abortion.