Replies to post #603262 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[goodietime]

And another Federal Judge, Andrews, will go along with covering this deceit.
IMO.

[BBANBOB]

MORDI


"""the underwriters were Class 18 or "equity". And POR 7 was voted on and approved with a preferred equity definition which does not include them"""

THE ONLY EQUITY at the time WAS ONLY Class 21 or Class 22 !!!!!!!!!!!!

ONLY UNTIL MARCH of 2012 were the preferds DEFINED BY THE COMPANY as EQUITY!!!
NOW WE ALL VOTED on POR 7 based on what was DEFINED in it at the time and that was plain and simply that CL:ASS 19 could not BE DILUTED, only Class 22 and Class 21 could be diluted!!!!

And it doesn't matter if we at the time KNEW those conditions or not, THEY WERE NOT supposed to be place in CLASS 19, only in 22 or 21.

Just like any contract or agreement the CONDITIONS of either of those MUST BE FOLLOWED, if they are in or against your best interest, ALL CONDITIONS apply

[hotmeat]

The only "spin" is being done by YOU since it was clearly documented that since 2011 the UW's , WAMPQ and WAMKQ were all placed in Class 19 at the same time.

This wanton denial of that fact is rather sad and just goes to show how narratives are placed uppermost over the truth.

A secondary fact is that the LT was given FULL authority to settle all disputes without further intervention of the court.

Also to your point of deprivation of P's where one would have to own 1000 P's to receive a paltry 15 of those COOP shares held by the UW's.

I'd venture to guess that very few retail holders hold in excess of 5000 P's thus making that paltry distribution basically not worth the grief.

Those who do own P's in large numbers are free to chime in on whether they even care about such an irrelevant distribution in contrast to the resolution of the cases.

Just as her attempts failed on the 19th, so too will her appeal fail thus making this whole issue moot!



Here it is once again...…these are called FACTS!!!!!!!!!


Quote: "On February 3, 2011, the Debtors and the Underwriters agreed to resolve the Twenty- Ninth Claims Objection by...break…and Claim Nos. 2909, 2569, 3935, and 3938, as supplemented, to be classified in then Class 20 of the Sixth Amended Plan"


Quote: "Thereafter, the Debtors filed their Seventh Amended Joint Plan of Affiliated Debtors Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code [Docket No. 9178] (as amended, the “Plan”). Claims and interests that had been classified in Class 20 of the Sixth Amended Plan were re-classified into Class 19 of the Plan, and therefore the Underwriters’ Class 20 Claims were converted to Class 19 Claims (the “Class 19 Claims”)."