News Focus
News Focus
icon url

zeus_0100

12/22/19 8:48 AM

#603253 RE: ReikoBlack #603222

IMO, alice sounds a lot like she sounded when she posted over on bp, that is to say, extremely dumb.
icon url

mordicai

12/22/19 9:14 AM

#603256 RE: ReikoBlack #603222

So if a creditor or shareholder is shortchanged what they are due and takes an appeal to protect their rights, per Walrath that is not a sufficient contested matter that needs to be addressed before the bankruptcy is closed. So then I ask, what other type contested matter is of greater importance and sufficient? Walrath has just rendered the comments to Rule 350 of no consequence imo.
icon url

Civil War General

12/22/19 9:34 AM

#603257 RE: ReikoBlack #603222

How about a subrogation action against the Underwriters for unfair taking?
icon url

hotmeat

12/22/19 10:23 AM

#603261 RE: ReikoBlack #603222

That's assuming the LT even grants the UW's their Class 18 claim.

They could easily revert to their original position and deny both claims.

That would then render AG's action moot, forcing her to seek redress against the UW's.

I'm sure only the lawyers would love that!