Replies to post #16276 on Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[rottenapple]

high C..." I made a statemnt that it would do more harm than good to release the number and cost of units sold."

The only way it would do more harm than good is if the numbers were bad. If they were selling like hotcakes the pps would go up and there would be an influx of cash. Thus, no need for the massive dilution getting ready to get shoved down our throats!

Wouldn't you agree?? Of course not because I've never seen you agree with anything but management. Just like you did with the "B" boys. I think you were the last holdout making excuses for them too!

[Xenophon]

HighC/Inet: are you unable to answer a simple question? Let me restate it for you, as you're an old feller and maybe don't hear real well.

CDEx is BROKE - they are HOPING to raise up to $3-4M, which Griff stated is the anticipated burn rate for next year. CDEx CLAIMS they have all this revolutionary tech that is "backburnered" due to lack of funds (despite the 2006 spending having been $3M!).

Now Griffin says he anticipates using some of the $3-4M PIPE money for ACQUISITIONS.

Please explain using common sense why he would divert money from the backburnered revolutionary tech development (which has ALREADY consumed $25,000,000 post-LOCH) in favor of ACQUISITIONS that he lacks the infrastructure or technical knowledge to develop?

I will await your common sense explanation, Inet. I have one, butt I'll hold it until after you provide yours, so as not to steal your thunder.