Replies to post #12013 on Obocon Inc. (OBCN)

[Slojab]

Well, here we go again.

Since we're repeating old posts, I guess I need to repost old replies.

#1 is meaningless, as the filings are incomplete and insufficient.

#2 is meaningless, as it only pertains to the outgoing company.

#3 See #2.

#4 See #3

#5 See #4

#6 Condition of new company taking over, which hasn't happened yet.

#7 Refer to #6

#8 Refer to #7

#9 So what?

#10 See sam's post.

#11 Speculation isn't DD

[LegalTrendAnalyst]

Isn’t that just what you’ve been posting already? Something new here I’m not seeing?