News Focus
News Focus
icon url

LouisDesyjr

10/12/19 10:03 PM

#7405 RE: Tradernick5 #7404

No, you misunderstand.

The 17.5% was just used to calculate how many common shares the new company should have, and it was set so the warrants would be 17.5% of that.

IF the warrants are exercised, and exchanged for common shares, then you would pay the exercise price, $8.40, per warrant that is converted into a common share. This is called 'exercising the warrants'. You pay $8.40 per warrant, and get that many common shares.

This only makes sense if the common shares are about $8.40 because if the common shares are trading for less than $8.40 then you would just buy them on the open market.

There is an exception to this, and it is unusual due to the situation surrounding the company. Since only common shareholders are allowed to get a set of financial statements, some people, myself included, would be willing to exercise a warrant even if the common shares were value far below $8.40 per share. That is because it may be the only way at this time to get a share of the common, and then be able to get a copy of the financial statements.

Louis J. Desy Jr.


icon url

Richcc71

10/13/19 12:28 AM

#7407 RE: Tradernick5 #7404

Honestly Nick. For you to not grasp all this by now is unbelievable. The 17.5% was the amount of equity the old ANV shareholders got of the new company in the form of warrants. The anti dilution pill means we will always own 17.5% of the new company. Which is where if they dilute our warrants stay the same but when we convert them we’d receive the factor increase in common shares. This has been explained many times to you. Goodness me.