Replies to post #22585 on Mosaic ImmunoEngineering Inc (CPMV)

[papadedavid]

QUESTION PRESENTED
Whether the United States Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit’s development and application of
the doctrine of “prosecution history disclaimer” is
consistent with fundamental principles of separation
of powers, the Patent Act, and long-established
Supreme Court precedent.

[drobx]

Interesting to skim through that. Did you catch this on the last page:

Respectfully submitted,
KENNETH W. STARR
THE LANIER LAW FIRM

[papadedavid]

You have to wonder why didn't they release a pr on this...sure they are not trying to pump the stock...JMHO.

NO. 19-____
In the
Supreme Court of the United States
TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LIMITED LLC ET AL.,
Petitioners,
–v–
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., ET AL.,
Respondents.
On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI
KENNETH W. STARR
THE LANIER LAW FIRM
10940 W. SAM HOUSTON PKWY. N.,
SUITE 100
HOUSTON, TX 77064
[phone]
[e-mail]
DENISE M. DE MORY
COUNSEL OF RECORD
AARON R. HAND
LAUREN N. ROBINSON
VERNON C. GRIGG III
WENDY J. THURM
BUNSOW DE MORY LLP
701 EL CAMINO REAL
REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063
[phone]
[e-mail]
SEPTEMBER 6, 2019 COUNSEL FOR PETITIONERS
SUPREME COURT PRESS ? [phone] ? BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-324/114984/20190906142125051_TechnologyProperties%20Petition%20E%20FILE%20Sep%206%202019.pdf