News Focus
News Focus
icon url

DaveAu

09/25/19 6:26 PM

#226239 RE: DewDiligence #226234

ENTA—After listening to the CC and further contemplating the EDP-305 dataset reported today, I think ENTA should strongly consider switching from EDP-305 to the company's backup FXR compound.



Is there any reason to believe their backup compound won't have the same problem? Maybe they should consider abandoning FXR.
icon url

lgonber

09/27/19 6:52 AM

#226262 RE: DewDiligence #226234

Hello Dew, I know you are a long term investor in ENTA. I used to own the stock a few years ago I bought at $40s but sold at $100.
Do you think after yesterday’s news it is good time to get back in? I know next week is data for Phase 2a data on EDP-938. Would be an opportunity to get back in before data release? Or better wait? Thanks for your wait
icon url

DewDiligence

11/21/19 7:37 PM

#227032 RE: DewDiligence #226234

Musings on ENTA’s EDP-305 NASH program:

Regrettably (IMO), ENTA is continuing the EDP-305 NASH program and intends to use doses of 1.5mg and 2.0mg in the planned phase-2b trial.

Inasmuch as the 2.5mg dose in the phase-2a trial caused undue pruritis (#msg-151356515, #msg-151358332), and the 1.0mg dose in the phase-2a trial had insufficient efficacy (as monotherapy), testing doses of 1.5mg and 2.0mg in phase-2b could be threading a needle with no eye (#msg-151358158).

If it were up to me, I would bag the EDP-305 NASH program* and move ahead full steam with EDP-297 (#msg-152423076).

With $400M in cash and no debt (#msg-152422891), ENTA need not fall prey to Zebra’s Law.

--
*EDP-305 has an in-progress phase-2 in PBC, but this trial is not costing ENTA much money.