ENTA—After listening to the CC and further contemplating the EDP-305 dataset reported today, I think ENTA should strongly consider switching from EDP-305 to the company's backup FXR compound.
Is there any reason to believe their backup compound won't have the same problem? Maybe they should consider abandoning FXR.
Hello Dew, I know you are a long term investor in ENTA. I used to own the stock a few years ago I bought at $40s but sold at $100. Do you think after yesterday’s news it is good time to get back in? I know next week is data for Phase 2a data on EDP-938. Would be an opportunity to get back in before data release? Or better wait? Thanks for your wait
Regrettably (IMO), ENTA is continuing the EDP-305 NASH program and intends to use doses of 1.5mg and 2.0mg in the planned phase-2b trial.
Inasmuch as the 2.5mg dose in the phase-2a trial caused undue pruritis (#msg-151356515, #msg-151358332), and the 1.0mg dose in the phase-2a trial had insufficient efficacy (as monotherapy), testing doses of 1.5mg and 2.0mg in phase-2b could be threading a needle with no eye (#msg-151358158).
If it were up to me, I would bag the EDP-305 NASH program* and move ahead full steam with EDP-297 (#msg-152423076).
With $400M in cash and no debt (#msg-152422891), ENTA need not fall prey to Zebra’s Law.
-- *EDP-305 has an in-progress phase-2 in PBC, but this trial is not costing ENTA much money.