Replies to post #141547 on NanoViricides Inc (NNVC)

[KMBJN]

It's good that reasonable people can hold different opinions.

NNVC and BLP are still both open books, in that they are still working on developing their technologies, and so are open to doubt. It's possible that the technologies won't ever be developed according to plan.

Both are based on sound science (BLP revolutionary but true). Both have shown impressive early results. Both are ridiculed. Both have used lots of capital and taken a really long time to get a product out for sales.

I thinks there’s a simpler explanation which is they have not, and have never been, honest about their progress, results, technology...

I also believe there are significantly more examples of this explanation being true vs. simply chalking it up to “trouble making the ‘cides.”

But I also believe in quantum physics so I must be ignorant. The laws of physics are all just lies, right?

All of quantum physics and all the investions we use today that would only work if the essence of quantum mechanics (QM) were right would have to be wrong for BLP's "hydrino hype( below ground state hydrogen atom) to be true. So we know that BLP can only sell its story to those who don't understand the ABC s of QM.

It's a fallacy to state that Mills'/BLP's GUTCP theory invalidates "the essence of quantum mechanics" or that anyone who believes in QM is ignorant. People who study physics know that QM has LOTS of problems with it. Mills solves those problems. It will take a lot to convince some people though.

Likewise with NNVC. They showed promising preclinical results in animal models of viral disease, yet many remain unconvinced.

Skepticism is good. Blind faith without examining the evidence is bad. Making claims of fraud without showing proof is also bad. Dismissing something because one doesn't understand it is laziness. Believing something because "everyone else does" is the easy way.


Best of luck to all. The truth will come out in time.