New York’s new law does not explicitly define “health.”
In what is considered a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors — physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age — relevant to the wellbeing of the patient. All these factors may relate to health. This allows the attending physician the room he needs to make his best medical judgment.”
Pretty vague as to the "health" of the woman involved. If a woman is mad at her husband or boyfriend does that qualify as an "emotional" need to abort, while the baby is in the birth canal? I guess it would, if you could find the right doctor to agree to that. And don't tell me they don't exist. There are probably more than a few that would perform the abortion, just for the money involved.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
