News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Chompiee

07/28/19 5:42 PM

#164678 RE: EOT #164677

From the SH meeting. Army is on the back burner right now because the Case Officer that was assigned to KBLB took another position.
icon url

WebSlinger

07/28/19 5:48 PM

#164679 RE: EOT #164677

<< The original contract was to DEVELOP a fibre for the US MILITARY. We were SUCCESSFUL. >>

That is totally incorrect.

The original contract (for about $100K) was for shootpacks.

The extended contract (for about $900K) was for 220 lbs. of custom fiber.

For the extended contract, they CLAIMED that they "developed" a fiber for the Army in-house, but they never DELIVERED it. It was due last Aug / Sep, and is now almost 1 year late. And that is why they haven't gotten paid for it.
icon url

faithabides

07/28/19 6:20 PM

#164684 RE: EOT #164677

Col317, I stated plenty of times that the relationship continues. It’s pretty clear that it does. Those that choose to not believe and actually act in the opposite will find out soon enough ... either to their own missed opportunity or actual loss.