News Focus
News Focus
icon url

blackhawks

06/25/19 9:04 PM

#316078 RE: Tearex #316076

Purposely left open to interpretation by partisan hacks.



Like Red State.

Let's cut the shit. Do you approve of meeting with a rep from Russia to get dirt on Hillary, which JR said he would really like 'especially later in the year'?

Would you cut slack to Chelsea and her mother if she went to such a meeting under the same pretext RE dirt on Trump?
icon url

fuagf

06/25/19 9:20 PM

#316081 RE: Tearex #316076

Tearex, Even some on Fox get that quote of Mueller's right

Mueller: ‘We would have said so’ if clear Trump didn’t commit crime

Posted 7:09 AM, May 29, 2019, by CNN Wire and FOX 5 Digital Team, Updated at 08:09PM, May 29, 2019

WASHINGTON -- Special counsel Robert Mueller said in a rare and remarkable public statement Wednesday that charging President Donald Trump was not an option his office could consider.

Mueller, speaking from the Justice Department, said he's closing the special counsel's office and returning to private life.

"If we had confidence the President clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so," Mueller said.

https://fox5sandiego.com/2019/05/29/robert-mueller-to-make-rare-public-statements/

One could ask, why do you

"You can say that as many times as you want, but he did not. He said "even if we could". Not even though we did prove it.
Purposely left open to interpretation by partisan hacks.
"

continue to lie about that quote of Mueller's?

If that question were asked the answer would be because YOU ARE NOTHING but a partisan hack of the worst kind.

That is one thing which today you are again illustrating clearly is beyond dispute.

AND just as one of the many you ignore, AGAIN

Was the Wikileaks dump of emails just a coincidence right after 'Russia if you're listening...?'
Lotta coincidences....
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=149594346