Replies to post #316019 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

Tearex, "C'mon, Mommy, i robbed a bank, but i didn't get caught so you surely can't
call me a criminal. Don't be so unfair. You've picked on me since i was a tiny child!"
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148696428

"[...]Therefore because you say he obstructed justice with something he did not do (firing Mueller), he is guilty.""

And. Mommy, that other time i really tried to build that bomb to bomb the abortion clinic, but i was stopped before i could do it!

[blackhawks]

You've also read repeatedly that intent is sufficient for charging obstruction. Look it up. OOJ will be in the articles of impeachment.


Robert Mueller's team declined to prosecute Donald Trump, Jr. and members of the campaign for campaign finance violations for their participation in the June 2016 meeting at Trump Tower in part because they couldn't prove that they "willfully" violated the
law.

Same thing Comey said about Clinton...couldn't prove 'willfully'.

You lost your shit about that, still losing it, why not about this....?

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/robert-mueller-report-public/h_4bb9d6e2c4cadd3297660a97f618ad1d

Here's what it says in the report:

"Taking into account the high burden to establish a culpable mental state in a campaign-finance prosecution and the difficulty in establishing the required valuation, the office decided not to pursue criminal campaign-finance charges against Trump Jr. or other campaign officials for the events culminating in the June 9 meeting."

Mueller's team explained: "The office ultimately concluded that, even if the principal legal questions were resolved favorably to the government, a prosecution would encounter difficulties proving that campaign officials or individuals connected to the campaign willfully violated the law."