Replies to post #315724 on Tornado Alley (PROG)

[Tearex]

Your link is a partisan spin opinion, and not factual.
Total made up BS!

“And so the investigators knew that unless they found something that was a smoking gun, where someone told Secretary Clinton, "You know, you shouldn't be doing this," or where she acknowledged it or where … there's an indication of her obstructing justice, the case was unlikely to be prosecuted,” he said.

You want a link.

18 U.S. Code §?1924. Unauthorized removal and retention of classified documents or material
U.S. Code

(a) Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, knowingly removes such documents or materials without authority and with the intent to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1924

The law does not say anything like what Comey or your link made up about intent.

It was clearly her intent to operate a private server outside the observation of public scrutiny and availability of review (I'm talking about communications outside .gov).

This is why she destroyed the evidence subpoenaed by congress(OOJ).

Yes, Hillarys private server was wiped clean, "like with a cloth", and electronic devices were physically destroyed after being subpoenaed.

Just imagine Donald Trump having evidence destroyed after being requested by Mueller!