News Focus
News Focus
icon url

blackhawks

06/19/19 2:30 AM

#315408 RE: fuagf #315407

Trump Is Betting That Anger Can Still Be Power

Trump 2020 may sound a lot like Trump 2016, but this time around the fusion of president and party is complete.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/06/19/opinion/trump-2020-announcement.html

By Peter Wehner

Contributing Opinion Writer
June 19, 2019

Donald Trump has been the most persistently unpopular first-term president in the postwar era. Much of the nation is exhausted and embarrassed by his presidency, pining for normalcy, eager to change the channel. The president’s own internal polls show Mr. Trump trailing the former vice president, Joe Biden, not only in many battleground states Mr. Trump won in 2016, but in traditional Republican strongholds like Georgia.

But as we saw Tuesday night, during a huge, raucous rally in Orlando, Fla., Trump is viewed by his supporters almost as a demigod. One excited Trump supporter who was there told me he was overwhelmed by the unwavering support for Mr. Trump, driven by a sense that Mr. Trump has been deeply wronged — by the Mueller investigation, by the media and by what he described as “anti-Trump forces.” He also told me, based on conversations he had with others at the rally, that Mr. Trump’s supporters believe his era is “spiritually driven.” What he meant by that is that person after person reported that when it comes to Mr. Trump and the presidency, “God has chosen him and is protecting him.” It is the Children of Light against the Children of Darkness.

That certainly aligns with my sense of how Trump supporters see things. It’s not just that Mr. Trump is exceedingly popular among Republicans, with his approval rating this year hovering in the high 80s and low 90s. It is that he has won their undying loyalty and affection. As a Republican friend of mine put it to me recently, Mr. Trump is the general leading the army into battle against an enemy that needs to be vanquished for the good of the nation.

When facing an existential threat, there is no room for public dissent. In Mr. Trump’s Republican Party, you are expected to treat him with reverence, submission and obeisance, or you will be treated as a traitor to king and cause. Just ask Jeff Flake, Bob Corker, Mark Sanford and Justin Amash.

It was unthinkable when Donald Trump rode down the escalator at Trump Tower four years ago to announce his improbable run for the presidency, but his imprint on the Republican Party is at least as large as that of Ronald Reagan’s at a comparable point in his presidency. The Republican Party has been transformed by Mr. Trump.

That’s true in some areas more than others. In the realm of policy, Mr. Trump has pursued a fairly traditional Republican agenda on judicial appointments, abortion, tax cuts, deregulation and military spending. What makes Mr. Trump transformative is the areas in which he is redefining the right.

Let’s review. Until Mr. Trump, the Republican Party was committed, at least philosophically, to free trade. It is now led by a man who is instinctively protectionist and refers to himself as “Tariff Man.” The pre-Trump Republican Party championed limited government and entitlement reform; today it shows no interest in either. It was once unthinkable that a Republican president would target private companies in order to settle personal scores. For Mr. Trump, this is routine.

Republicans flayed President Barack Obama for implementing the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program despite lacking the constitutional and legal authority to do so. Yet Republicans in Congress overwhelmingly supported Mr. Trump’s emergency declaration to fund border wall construction despite its being a clear violation of the separation of powers.

Past Republican presidents were deeply committed to American global leadership, the Atlantic alliance, good relations with allies like Canada and publicly calling out brutal regimes like North Korea. No more. Today the Republican Party is led by a man who levels attacks on Canada even as he admits he “fell in love” after exchanging “beautiful letters” with the leader of North Korea, Kim Jong-un.

Mr. Kim, it used to go without saying, rules what is arguably the most repressive government on earth; this is the man to whom Mr. Trump makes enormous concessions while getting almost nothing in return.

And let’s not forget, however remote it might seem now, that the idea that a Republican president would side with the leader of Russia rather than his own intelligence agencies was once unimaginable. Under Mr. Trump, it happened. Mr. Trump has also turned a party that for decades was pro-immigration and friendly with Mexico — and in the case of Reagan, in favor of amnesty for undocumented workers and against putting up even a fence on the southern border — into one that is increasingly antagonistic toward immigrants and relentlessly hostile to Mexico, the current thaw notwithstanding.

Mr. Trump has flipped the Republican Party from outward looking to inward looking, from the champion of an open society into the cheerleader of a closed one, from optimism to pessimism. (It’s a long road to travel to get from “Morning in America” to “American carnage.”) A party that once claimed to abhor “identity politics” now relies on them as its closing argument in elections.

But as significant as these changes have been, the Trump transformation of the Republican Party has been even more decisive and far-reaching in other realms.

Republicans once fashioned themselves as members of the party of ethics, morality and law-and-order; today they fiercely defend a president who is essentially an unindicted co-conspirator for authorizing hush money payments to a porn star, who is a promiscuous liar, a man whom Robert Mueller could not clear of obstruction of justice and who just last week indicated he would eagerly listen to a foreign power that offered damaging information on his opponent during the upcoming president race. He even criticized the F.B.I. director he chose for saying that the agency would want to know about any foreign election meddling.

The most withering line of the year, so far, came from one of the Democratic candidates, Pete Buttigieg, who referred to Vice President Mike Pence, an outspoken evangelical Christian, as a “cheerleader for the porn star presidency.”

Many of those who during the Bill Clinton presidency insisted character and personal integrity were essential qualities in political leaders have in the Trump era decided such matters are utterly unimportant.

By their refusal to confront those flaws and failures in Mr. Trump, they are complicit in the debasement of American culture and politics. Many of Mr. Trump’s most vocal and prominent evangelical supporters, because of their rank hypocrisy, are doing more to damage Christian witness than the so-called New Atheists ever could.

Beyond that, in their ferocious defense of the president, Trump supporters are signaling that decency is a form of weakness, that cruelty is a welcome and highly effective political weapon and that the low road is the preferred road.

At one point, Republicans were willing to tolerate Mr. Trump’s brutish tactics and reprehensible character as the price of party loyalty; today many of them seem to relish it. They see the dehumanization of others as a form of entertainment.

All of this has come at a crushing price, including driving away young people in huge numbers. The Trump ascendancy has made far too many Republicans increasingly contemptuous of serious intellectual and policy argument, indifferent to empirical truth and disdainful of governing.

They prefer to turn politics into an ongoing freak show. But the greater price is the indelible stain all this places on the integrity of a party many of us once believed in, served in and took pride in.


Mr. Trump’s takeover of the Republican Party is complete. Healing and renewal can’t begin until the party rejects the malignancy of Trumpism and embraces the belief that politics is not only a necessary activity but a noble calling, an imperfect but essential way to advance justice. That day may yet come. Right now it feels light years away.

icon url

fuagf

07/25/19 5:03 AM

#319744 RE: fuagf #315407

Trump's 2020 campaign launch: the key takeaways

"Trump rehashes gripes, rips ‘radical’ Dems in 2020 launch"

After two and a half years in office, Trump remains fixated on the same grievances – and successes

Adam Gabbatt in Orlando
@adamgabbatt

Wed 19 Jun 2019 12.52 AEST
Last modified on Thu 20 Jun 2019 11.07 AEST

VIDEO - 3:25 Lot of fake news back there': Trump launches 2020 campaign – video highlights

Donald Trump launched his 2016 presidential campaign on 16 June 2015 .. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/jun/16/donald-trump-announces-run-president , by descending an escalator in front of a small crowd in Trump Tower. Four years on, he launched his 2020 pitch to be re-elected to the White House to 20,000 people at Orlando’s Amway Center on a humid, rainy Florida night.

--
Trump 2020 launch: Bernie Sanders attacks president's 'lies' and 'distortions' – as it happened
Read more > https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2019/jun/18/trump-2020-campaign-election-launch-speech-live-news-today-latest-updates-orlando-florida
--

Trump is bidding for a second term at a time when the economy is doing well and unemployment is at its lowest rate for half a century. But he heads into the campaign as a historically unpopular president beset by scandal and having shattered many presidential norms. Just 42.5% of Americans approve of Trump’s performance, while 53.1% disapprove.

Here are the key takeaways:

Socialism will be front and center in 2020

Mike Pence introduced Trump, and the vice-president used his speech to hammer away at the Democrats, repeatedly accusing them of being “socialists”.

“It was freedom, not socialism, that ended slavery [and] won two wars,” Pence said. Make of that what you will, but it’s a line that Republicans seem determined to hammer home as they seek to paint Democrats as unhinged and even vaguely communist. In his own speech, Trump said Americans don’t believe in socialism, “they believe in freedom”. We’ll be hearing that false equivalence a lot on the road to November 2020.

A big crowd in Orlando … but early departures

Trump had said he would fill the Amway Center, which has a capacity of a little under 20,000, and fill it he did. The crowd cheered wildly when he emerged, and his largest applause lines – criticizing the press, making false claims about wall-building – got big cheers. But Trump spoke for almost an hour and a half, and well before then some people began to trickle out. It would be unwise to read too much into the early departures – it was a long, hot day all round – but for a president whose strength comes from personal magnetism, seeing people leave early isn’t a great sign.

Trump has no plans to turn forward the clock

Much of this speech could have been given two years ago – and some parts four years ago. Launching his re-election campaign in theory gave Trump a chance for a fresh start, and to set new goals for a second term. Instead he seemed happiest when he was discussing Hillary Clinton’s emails – inspiring the “Lock her up!” chant – and talking about his 2016 victory. The address showed that after two and a half years in office, Trump remains fixated on his same grievances – and successes.

It’s the economy …

Trump’s touting of the economy’s success brought big cheers and by most measures, the US economy is doing well. Unemployment is low, and GDP growth – seen as one of the best indicators of an economy’s health – is high. Of course, Trump being Trump, when he did discuss the economy, he falsely claimed the US has the lowest unemployment rate in the history of the country and exaggerated GDP growth. But Trump also got sidetracked from talking up his economic successes (whether they are attributable to him or not), and reverted to common applause lines and attacks. All the warm-up speakers before Trump focused on the economy, and Trump’s campaign strategists would probably prefer him to do the same.

[INSERT: An A- for the U.S. Economy, but Failing Grades for Trump’s Policies
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147874443]


Immigration will remain an issue

The president attacked Democrats as “unhinged” and blamed their inaction for the situation at the border, claiming that undocumented immigrants are “pouring in”. He also attacked Democrats over sanctuary cities and – as one would expect – brought up the border wall, claiming 400 miles of it will be built by the end of next year. The problem is most of that is only going to replacing existing wall. But will his supporters care?

Trump will also run against the media

Their names might not be on any ballot but it was clear that Trump intends to run against America’s journalists and media organizations as much as any Democrat. He once again singled out the press pen in the middle of the stadium, pointing them out to the crowd, who roundly booed them and chanted “CNN sucks”.

“That is a lot of fake news back there,” Trump said

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jun/18/trump-2020-campaign-highlights-key-takeaways-what-you-need-to-know-re-election-launch

-

Project Alamo

"Project Alamo" was a database of voter information created for Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign and an associated fundraising and political advertising operation on social media platforms. It was organized by the Giles-Parscale firm in San Antonio, Texas. The campaign paid Giles-Parscale as much as $94 million for fundraising, political advertising, and digital media services, including the creation of Trump's web site. A new database of voter information named "Project Alamo" was at the heart of Giles-Parscale's efforts, allowing highly targeted advertising on social media platforms. The advertising campaigns added to the database over time, driving more effective targeting. The scale of the fundraising and political advertising campaigns on social media was massive, with hundreds of thousands of targeted ads being delivered daily. Project Alamo has been credited[by whom?] as an important factor in Trump's 2016 victory..[1][2][3][4]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Alamo

-

Jared Kushner has been meeting with Trump campaign officials to discuss 2020 fundraising and spending strategy

Published Wed, Jul 17 2019 5:19 PM EDT

Brian Schwartz
@schwartzbCNBC

Key Points

* President Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner, who is also a senior White House advisor, is regularly giving
counsel to 2020 Trump campaign leaders on how to appeal to online donors and where to spend their money.

* Kushner and campaign chief Brad Parscale regularly hold strategy sessions on how to improve messaging
about Trump’s accomplishments to small-dollar donors, according to people with direct knowledge of the matter.

* Kushner also has pushed for the campaign to spend more money on the digital
fundraising operation rather than relying on more traditional methods such as mailers.
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/07/17/trump-son-in-law-jared-kushner-huddled-last-week-with-trump-campaign.html

See also:

Secret Memo Warned Donald Trump Data Firm About Breaking U.S. Law | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139577538

Dale C, Why fear is more prevalent — and powerful — among conservatives
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=139663627
icon url

BOREALIS

07/25/19 11:22 AM

#319786 RE: fuagf #315407

Schiff downplays impeachment, says that at this point, Trump is only leaving ‘by being voted out’

By John Wagner
July 25 at 9:38 AM

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) on Thursday sharply downplayed the prospects of removing President Trump from office through impeachment, saying the only way he’s leaving office, at this point, is “by being voted out.”


Schiff’s comments came a day after former special counsel Robert S. Mueller III appeared at back-to-back hearings, including one at which Schiff presided, and offered no blockbuster revelations about his investigation into Russian election interference and Trump’s possible obstruction of justice.

“We do need to be realistic, and that is, the only way he’s leaving office, at least at this point, is by being voted out, and I think our efforts need to be made in every respect to make sure we turn out our people,” Schiff said during an interview on CNN. “Should we put the country through an impeachment? I haven’t been convinced yet that we should. Going through that kind of momentous and disruptive experience for the country, I think, is not something we go into lightly.”

[Democrats are now left with one option to end Trump’s presidency: The 2020 election]
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/democrats-are-now-left-with-one-option-to-end-trumps-presidency-the-2020-election/2019/07/24/946f6ffa-ae34-11e9-8e77-03b30bc29f64_story.html?utm_term=.6466a5a75197

More than 90 House Democrats have publicly called for the launch of impeachment proceedings against Trump, and some in the party had hoped Mueller’s testimony would lead to a fresh groundswell of support. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has continued to resist the effort.

Schiff cautioned Thursday that even if Trump were impeached by the House, he would claim exoneration if acquitted in the Republican-led Senate.

“I would be delighted if we had a prospect of removing him through impeachment, but we don’t, and the most attractive thing to me about an impeachment is that it’s among the strongest forms of censure we have,” Schiff said. “But the same is true of an acquittal for the president. That’s the strongest form of exoneration for him, and that stays my hand.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/schiff-downplays-impeachment-says-that-at-this-point-trump-is-only-leaving-by-being-voted-out/2019/07/25/4ce96424-aede-11e9-bc5c-e73b603e7f38_story.html?utm_term=.5b9fcc76db4c
icon url

fuagf

08/17/19 11:36 PM

#323215 RE: fuagf #315407

Trump 2020 campaign ad payments hidden by layers of shell companies

"Trump rehashes gripes, rips ‘radical’ Dems in 2020 launch
"Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board: Our endorsement for president in 2020"
"

By Anna Massoglia
June 13, 2019


UNITED STATES – JULY 21: Donald Trump, Republican nominee for
president, speaks in the Quicken Loans Arena on the final night
of the Republican National Convention in Cleveland, Ohio,
July 21, 2016. (Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

The Trump 2020 campaign funneled money to a shell company tied to ad buyers at the center of an alleged illegal coordination scheme with the National Rifle Association (NRA) as recently as May 2019, according to new government records analyzed by OpenSecrets.

The previously unreported ad buys for Trump’s re-election campaign routed through a secretive limited-liability company known as Harris Sikes Media LLC were revealed in Federal Communications Commission (FCC) records in OpenSecrets’ political ad database .. https://www.opensecrets.org/ad-data/ .

The Trump campaign stopped reporting payments to ad buyers at American Media & Advocacy Group following allegations .. https://www.thetrace.org/2018/12/trump-nra-campaign-coordination/ .. that the company facilitated illegal coordination between the campaign and the NRA through American Media’s affiliates National Media Research, Planning & Placement and Red Eagle Media Group. The companies share a storefront and employ many of the same individual ad buyers.

Trump’s 2020 campaign quietly continued to funnel money .. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2018/12/trump-2020-campaign-coordination/ .. to the same individuals through payments Harris Sikes Media.

With no public-facing facade and no individual ad buyers listed on FCC records other than those who also authorized ads for through National Media affiliates, Harris Sikes Media appears to operate as a shell company.

A representative of National Media confirmed to OpenSecrets that Harris Sikes is affiliated with the firm, describing it as a “firewall entity” used as a way to distance teams of buyers from campaigns so there is no conflict. In multiple instances, the Trump campaign and NRA made ad buys at the same local radio station within days of each other in FCC filings that list the same individual ad buyers at different National Media affiliates, including Harris Sikes Media.

Shared vendors are one of the factors the Federal Election Commission (FEC) considers when determining if communications may constitute illegal coordination between a campaign and outside group supporting it.

Despite multiple FCC records of political ad buys through Harris Sikes totaling tens of thousands of dollars throughout 2018 and as recently as May 2019, the Trump campaign has not reported any transactions with the firm to the FEC since June 2017.

But National Media chief finance officer Jon Ferrell signed records of ad buys .. https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/6146091-Donald-Trump-for-President-Wksb-20190516.html .. submitted under the guise of Harris Sikes Media to the FCC under the penalty of perjury as “agent of Donald Trump for President, Inc.” Other media buyers authorizing campaign ads under the guise of Harris Sikes Media also continue to be listed on FCC records for outside groups supporting Trump.



Payments for ad buys from May 2019 are not required to be disclosed to the FEC until the Trump campaign’s next quarterly report is due on July 15. However, a financial arrangement set up by Trump’s 2020 campaign may mean the payments revealed in FCC records reviewed by OpenSecrets won’t be reported to the FEC at all.

In the two years since the last reported disbursements to Harris Sikes Media, Trump’s campaign has reported significant payments to another obscure firm called American Made Media Consultants, a Delaware incorporated limited-liability company set up by Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale and controlled .. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/us/politics/trump-campaign-spending-midterms-2020.html .. by Trump campaign officials.

Trump campaign representatives said AMMC was created to act as a clearinghouse for media spending that would otherwise be done by outside vendors who typically take commissions on media or ad buys. The Washington Examiner reported .. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/trump-2020-outside-groups-raise-32-7-million-in-just-3-months-small-donors-rule .. that the group was created after a push from Parscale for more “transparency” over the Trump campaign’s ad buys, in part as an attempt to subdue media controversy over Parscale’s firm being paid to handle the campaign’s media buying.

Parscale says he has no financial stake in AMMC and the Trump campaign has claimed .. https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-campaign-machine-has-two-year-head-start-11555243200?ns=prod/accounts-wsj .. no one working on the campaign benefits financially from AMMC. Several top Trump campaign officials — including Parscale, who pushed for AMMC’s creation — have been paid salaries .. https://www.wsj.com/articles/trumps-campaign-machine-has-two-year-head-start-11555243200 .. through Parscale Strategies, which is also a Trump campaign vendor.

AMMC reportedly has an independent managing board .. https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/10/push-drain-swamp-trump-campaign-implements-rigorous-ethics-transparency-standards-staff-consultants/ , but the lack of transparency around how the entity is run and structured makes its composition difficult to determine from the outside looking in.

The model of presidential campaigns using in-house media buyers was pioneered by Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign, which deployed a similar arrangement buying ads under the umbrella media firm dubbed American Rambler .. https://www.politico.com/story/2012/10/romneys-unusual-in-house-ad-strategy-082217 .. that was run by top campaign aides.

Taken to the next level going into the 2020 election, this structure has enabled the Trump campaign to avoid disclosing precise details about its spending, allowing it to report millions of dollars in disbursements to AMMC without every disclosing the identities of any underlying sub-vendors to the FEC.

Campaign finance regulations are silent on the concepts of disclosing sub-vendors in this context but the FEC has issued some guidance on the issue.

FEC advisory opinions dating back to 1983 .. https://www.fec.gov/data/legal/advisory-opinions/1983-25/ .. indicate that a campaign may report disbursements to vendors hired for media services without reporting that vendor’s payments to sub-vendors.

In the opinions, the FEC advised that services actually provided vendors or sub-vendors must match the purpose of disbursements disclosed by the campaign, even if the sub-vendor is not disclosed.

There are some circumstances where a committee could violate their reporting obligations if they are intentionally trying to obfuscate the recipient. For example, the FEC found .. https://www.fec.gov/data/legal/matter-under-review/4872/ .. in 2002 that one campaign violated disclosure requirements by contracting directly with a vendor but reporting payments to a firm that served merely as a “conduit for payment” in an attempt “to conceal” the true vendor due to stigma associated with that vendor’s ties to onetime Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke.

In the wake of a federal court case .. https://publicintegrity.org/federal-politics/politicos-beware-court-ruling-could-prompt-more-transparent-campaign-spending/ .. touching on some of these issues earlier in 2019, campaign finance experts have drawn a distinction between “creating a false trail to hide the purpose of the documents versus using an umbrella vendor and having an umbrella vendor doing specific things that should be individually reported but aren’t.”

Trump’s campaign has reported recent payments to AMMC for purposes such as “media placement,” which echo the details of earlier disbursements to Harris Sikes Media. But the lack of transparency around the campaign’s payments makes it nearly impossible for the public to determine whether the campaign is paying Harris Sikes Media through AMMC or if they have deployed some other payment structure entirely. The Trump campaign and representatives of the firms had not responded to request for comment on the issue at the time of publication.

Many ads by the NRA and America First Policies purchased through National Media affiliates during the 2020 election cycle focus on issue advocacy rather than electioneering, meaning they are not subject to the same rules barring coordination as ads that use the terms “vote for” or “vote against.” However, Trump is often still prominently featured with some FCC disclosures even listing the issue in the ad as “pro-Trump,” increasingly blurring the line between ads supporting Trump’s agenda and his campaign as the 2020 election nears.

Support OpenSecrets?
https://www.opensecrets.org/donate?utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=donate&utm_source=blog_lower_box

About The Author
Anna first joined the Center for Responsive Politics in September 2015. She works with CRP's foreign influence and FARA data as part of the Foreign Lobby Watch Project, tracks FCC and digital political ad data, and is responsible for CRP's politically active nonprofit and nondisclosing "dark money" group data. She holds degrees in political science and psychology from North Carolina State University and a J.D. from the University of the District of Columbia School of Law.

https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2019/06/trump-2020-campaign-ad-payments-hidden-by-layers-of-shell-companies/

See also:

Richard W. Painter
@RWPUSA
A corporation that provides its workers as paid extras for a campaign rally is making a political contribution from the corporate treasury.
The FEC should investigate.

‘No Yelling, Shouting, Protesting': Shell Workers Captive Audience During Trump Visit
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=150589936

Election Fraud the G.O.P. Won’t Stress About
North Carolina officials present evidence a Republican operative stole a House race.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146976373
.. earlier ones on that one here ..
N.C. congressional candidate sought out aide, despite warnings over tactics
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=145455215&txt2find=Dowless
.. and here ..
What's 905 stolen ballots among friends?
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=145417886
.. with others here ..
Ah, Butina got 18 months.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=148502905

fuagf,...this is an all-inclusive time line connecting Butina the various individuals and illegal activity,....
The Very Strange Case of Two Russian Gun Lovers, the NRA, and Donald Trump
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142332515
.. with others here ..
To link - How Putin’s People Infiltrated the NRA to Help Trump and the GOP
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147062746