Replies to post #529307 on Fannie Mae-No Politics (FNMA)

[Donotunderstand]

Therefore the Fifth Amendment is not violated.

?

If the GOV takes our property and sells it to private hands - no taking?


Sorry but that does not appear accurate or manageable

[car123]

Wrong again.

The shares issued in the secondary offering are not for public use, they are for the benefit of private investors.

Who ask for extra ~120B capital? the existing shareholders - NO. It is gov ask for the ~120B to protect taxpayer. Is taxpayer a general public - YES. So the ~120B is asked by a public administration for protection of general public. So it is for public use. Only you can think of some other use.

[Guido2]

Calabria never said private placement. He did say public offerings.

NO MOELIS! NEVER MOELIS!

[bcde]

"The shares issued in the secondary offering are not for public use, they are for the benefit of private investors. Therefore the Fifth Amendment is not violated."

kthomp19,

LOL, you are conveniently forgetting the below fact.

FnF are private shareholder companies created by Gov for public policy purposes. So what ever Gov does to benefit FnF or third parties at the cost of private shareholders is still for public purpose.