Well if that's the case, then why bother with the process at all? Lazar, or any other of these cast of characters operating in this niche of the market, apply for these custodianships based solely on the premise that they will revive the shell to good standing. They make the argument to the judge that they can add value where there currently isn't any. It's not supposed to be a gamble, it's supposed to be the entire point of doing it at all, according to their plans laid out in a court of law.
What confuses me is how he was on the ball about getting the filings corrected and opinion letter resubmitted 3 times to finally become current, only to let the deadline pass and regain our yield sign just a few weeks later. I can't make any sense of that