News Focus
News Focus
icon url

arizona1

05/14/19 1:51 AM

#311092 RE: Tearex #311090

Which raises the question: If there was no concrete evidence of collusion, why did we need a special counsel?

Are you actually still asking this question?

Rosenstein on need for special counsel.

“Rosenstein, who said he generally disfavors special counsels, also defended his appointment of Mueller. He said there was ‘overwhelming evidence’ of Russian hacking and efforts on social media to influence the 2016 election, and that the investigation was ‘justified,’” the Post reports. “I determined that I needed a special counsel to help resolve the election interference investigation in a way that would best protect America from foreign adversaries and preserve public confidence in the long run,” he said. “I knew that some people would not be happy about it. I knew that it would be unpleasant for me and my family.”
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/05/rosenstein-speaks-publicly-on-firing-comey-appointing-mueller-and-his-immortal-soul.html
icon url

fuagf

05/14/19 1:52 AM

#311093 RE: Tearex #311090

Tearex, no one was chastised, as you put it. He was also reminded, read the fucking board.

You tripped yourself up again.

And no i'm not interested in your ice-rinky-dinky talking points on something done and dusted here.