News Focus
News Focus
icon url

blackhawks

05/09/19 5:44 PM

#310567 RE: ForReal #310565

Pretty lame, even for you.

Look, if Mueller, with his staff of Democrat investigators could not come up with anything, you need to accept that.



Mueller detailed the collusion that we all saw happen in plain sight, as well as numerous examples of obstruction of justice that also happened in plain sight.

The DOJ guideline requires that Congress take up what can't be prosecuted.

That now over 800 legal experts have weighed in to the effect that anyone else would be prosecuted for obstruction of justice is what YOU need to accept.

Your attempt to compare Mueller with the people you listed is idiotic, even for you.

icon url

BullNBear52

05/09/19 5:44 PM

#310568 RE: ForReal #310565

Hundreds of Former Federal Prosecutors Would Indict Donald Trump

By John CassidyMay 7, 2019

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/hundreds-of-former-federal-prosecutors-would-indict-donald-trump

I think it's up to 800 now.
icon url

sortagreen

05/10/19 10:32 AM

#310642 RE: ForReal #310565

You christofascist POS.

I would be interested to know which of Mueller's team you thought were Democrats. I would also be interested in knowing why you keep repeating that they found nothing. They were charged with investigating Russian interference in the 2016 election. I would say they demonstrated that in pretty convincing fashion.

Moreover, Michael Avenatti was never a hero. He's a scumbag, kind of like yourself. Cohen is also a scumbag, Trump's scumbag to be exact. That said though, when the story is written it will be Avenatti that took down Cohen and by extension Weisselberg and Pecker... and then the entire Trump organization.

Keep your eye on the southern district a-hole this ain't over by a long shot.

icon url

fuagf

05/10/19 8:41 PM

#310705 RE: ForReal #310565

ForReal, crap and more crap then more duly noted.