News Focus
News Focus
icon url

SooS416

05/08/19 11:12 AM

#82994 RE: MTLTrader #82992

They issued over 100M shares for payment of $65k in consulting costs, so just because there is no convertible debt, which there is convertible debt on the books doesn't mean they are not issuing more shares for payment of services.
icon url

bking1965

05/08/19 11:15 AM

#82999 RE: MTLTrader #82992

That is simply not true. The filings not only show more toxic debt on the books, but a huge reverse split authorized, more toxic debt authorized, and a larger AS.
icon url

Homebrew

05/08/19 11:16 AM

#83001 RE: MTLTrader #82992

I believe it's illegal to buyback with huge liabilities greater than assets.

Plus, VYST's basically broke, and can't afford to buy back shares.

there s nothing preventing them from starting a share buyback, period.

icon url

captbob2112

05/08/19 11:18 AM

#83003 RE: MTLTrader #82992

define diluted ...

How many "employees" and business transactions have been paid (for) in stock? It would be nice to see some open books here.

Kinda reminiscent of obama saying he would be the most transparent President ever. We all know how that worked out.
icon url

TenKay

05/08/19 12:01 PM

#83046 RE: MTLTrader #82992

Where is Feb 4 number coming from? The dilution time period is anywhere from Jan 1 to Apr 22...they don’t give specific issuance dates.

And they sold more debt and issued more convertible notes during Q1 some at a 35% discount and others at 50%.

Both are “toxic”.