News Focus
News Focus
icon url

4misscindylou

04/21/19 5:52 PM

#22973 RE: AJH92 #22972

Very educational Thank you!
icon url

stat_of_the_day

04/21/19 6:22 PM

#22979 RE: AJH92 #22972

Thanks for the post AJH!
icon url

StihlsawsRule

04/21/19 9:16 PM

#22988 RE: AJH92 #22972

AJH92 excellent DD, and this is only the beginning IMO for TMPS. Boeings problems continue, TMPS steps in to fill the void.
icon url

Trading B3ar

04/21/19 9:20 PM

#22992 RE: AJH92 #22972

Absolutely AJH92! Thank you for your amazing DD. Awesome to see a subject matter expert speak on the industry. I believe everyone here must be stoked!!!

TMPS

B3ar
icon url

GS1

04/22/19 3:05 AM

#23028 RE: AJH92 #22972

From CEO

The very first commercial aerial refueling contract was awarded by the US Navy in 1999 to the company that was running at the time. I subcontracted that work to Omega. I have known them for nearly 20 years. Since 1999, there have been no further contracts anywhere in the world awarded to a commercial company for aerial refueling with the exception of the UK Royal Air Force. The original Navy contract in 1999 was for a 25 flight hour test program. The Navy now pays Omega for approximately 2,000 flight hours per year. However, Omega has limited capability and resources (i.e. properly configured aircraft) and the demand from the Navy and Marine Corps exceeds the ability of Omega to deliver. Our ability to return the ex RAF Tri Stars to service should, at a minimum, put us in a good competitive position to capture a share of the Navy market alongside Omega. We will have to see if the Navy likes our proposal when we submit it later in the fall. There is also a large demand within NATO which we will be marketing very heavily after the TriStar deal is completed.
icon url

The Whale

04/23/19 2:15 PM

#23880 RE: AJH92 #22972

Wow!!!
icon url

greenwillow

04/23/19 2:19 PM

#23883 RE: AJH92 #22972

Great info.

Thank you.