Maybe because some of us believe in law, and just compensation and fraudulent conveyance of WMI property. Maybe because the framework is in place for payments to legacy holders outside of WMILT? Maybe because some of us can read documents and respectfully debate both issues. (Escrow and COOP) It is perfectly normal for escrow holders to speculate what could happen, most of us here are mature adults and can handle if nothing comes of them. What isn’t perfectly normal is for people to constantly hammer negative views towards escrow under the guise of looking out for our better interests and feelings, how altruistic of you folks. Answer me this, why is the framework in place for returns to markers outside of WMILT? Go ahead and spin, obfuscate, and ignore the question. The negativity towards escrow is either to quell expectations, spur conversations for a more popular board, (devils advocate) or keep people from buying coop because if being the accredited investor of the RMBS and ABS, COOP stands to make great gains and then take care of escrow markers. 11 years of people saying no. who would really waste so much time without a reason?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
