News Focus
News Focus
Replies to #1741 on Tour de France
icon url

Biowatch

11/14/06 9:35 PM

#1743 RE: Frank Pembleton #1741

As I said, I am out of it regarding current bikes. And the early carbon forks used to snap. Maybe riders have gotten clever enough not to hit anything. :-)
icon url

langostino

11/14/06 9:35 PM

#1744 RE: Frank Pembleton #1741

retro cool indeed!

That's a real beauty. Gorgeous setup. And I bet that Dura-Ace is a dream.
icon url

Biowatch

11/14/06 9:39 PM

#1745 RE: Frank Pembleton #1741

And you have rollers when you want to convince us you always ride in freezing cold? <vbg>
icon url

Biowatch

11/14/06 9:58 PM

#1746 RE: Frank Pembleton #1741

"--frame builders rule of thumb; thickness of the metal determines strength - diameter of the tubing determines ride quality."

I thought diameter of tubing, at least aluminum tubing, determined strength/stiffness for the weight.

i.e., aluminum frame bikes started out with a wider diameter in the tubes where strength and stiffness mattered.

I agree that the seat tube doesn't matter, although I'm told it doesn't hurt to drop your name and address down there on a piece of paper on the off chance someone steals your bike and you get the chance to prove it's yours. :-)

The technology has progressed substantially. As I recall, some of the innovations in wheel design were considered unfair at first, and they still don't allow recumbents as that would change the sport.

I have a copy of the first edition of this book. Maybe I should look at the newer edition:

Bicycling Science: Third Edition (Paperback)
by David Gordon Wilson