Replies to post #117248 on RushNet Inc (RSHN)

[billytbone]

He needs to go to confession after telling all his lies.

[Homeboyprov]

O.K. then. According to you and a few others, 500,000 acres is correct. HOWEVER....it's all based on government land grants. In other words if there are no grants then there is no land, no acquisitions, no 500,000 square foot facility.....

So what happens if we don't get the grants? Does everything simply fall apart and it's the end of the story with shareholders left holding the bag? Or are we back to simply producing knockout punch?

All my opinion.

[pocket.change]

But... but.... but.... I thought “this week” was the week for the BIG “to the moon” launching news and all we got was “500,000 acres” lies??!!?!! OOPS!!!

[stervc]

Per RSHN PR, regarding the 500,000 acres to be acquired...

I too reached out to RSHN and spoke to their lawyer. He confirmed that the 500,000 acres to be acquired is very real and is like what you had stated below, but that it is a group of properties that also includes California too:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147884991

Goulding confirmed 500,000 acres is correct.
It is partly Arizona and partly Texas, govt land grants. I texted the question to Goulding this morning wondering if the 500k was a typo...it was not.
Please refer to these posts.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147883745

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147883737

v/r
Sterling