News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HymanMinsky

03/29/19 10:40 AM

#66665 RE: I-Glow #66664

no amendment stating cancellation = no cancellation = commons will stay in tact.

meanwhile no fantasy LAWS will ever prove the cancel fantasy
icon url

Rustyhotrod

03/29/19 10:44 AM

#66667 RE: I-Glow #66664

That same question goes for you! We’re all waiting to see the part where it says shares are cancelled!
I can wait. Tick tock
icon url

Arch_Investor

03/29/19 10:51 AM

#66670 RE: I-Glow #66664

This is true, however the same goes for the latter where there is no solid proof of share 'cancelation'

The monitors reports are vague and briefly relay that the shareholders may not be paid due to lack of cash on purchase of company or that they MAY retain no value. However there is no definitive answer to it or the possibilities of remaining in tact. There can be no arguement made unless there is proof. FINRA would have also suspended the shares or cancelled by now if there was a definitive case made.

Given the STAY of proceedings and documents still under seal it alludes to the possibilities other than 'cancellation'. Nothing is CERTAIN or DEFINITE and that's a FACT. However if you feel otherwise please provide concrete proof of your opinion.

So time will tell