News Focus
News Focus
icon url

blackhawks

03/27/19 1:25 PM

#305506 RE: dropdeadfred #305505

You fabricated statements that do not represent majority Dem opinion, but that's what you do, what you NEED to do....make shit up.

How can anyone reject the Mueller report not having read anything but Barr's half-assed book report? Weeks to release? Must be lengthy.

Do YOU accept that Trump is 'not exonerated' on the question of obstruction of justice or based upon other matters in the report.

I mean Barr quotes Mueller as using those words.
icon url

BullNBear52

03/27/19 2:26 PM

#305511 RE: dropdeadfred #305505

Trump is not a crook. And I'm selling swamp land in FL.
icon url

BOREALIS

03/27/19 5:10 PM

#305537 RE: dropdeadfred #305505

Mueller grand jury 'continuing robustly,' prosecutor says

The revelation — while laced with uncertainty — indicates that the ongoing cases Mueller handed off could still feature significant developments, legal experts said.

By DARREN SAMUELSOHN
03/27/2019 12:29 PM EDT - Updated 03/27/2019 02:02 PM EDT

The special counsel grand jury that investigated Russian collusion into the 2016 presidential election is “continuing robustly” despite the end of Robert Mueller’s probe, a federal prosecutor said in court Wednesday.

The revelation — while laced with uncertainty — indicates that the ongoing cases Mueller handed off after concluding his probe could still feature significant developments, legal experts said.

David Goodhand, an assistant U.S. attorney, acknowledged the grand jury’s active status during a hearing in federal district court over a push to unveil the identity of a foreign state-owned firm that has been held in contempt for defying a Mueller subpoena.

The mystery company’s case was denied a hearing earlier this week before the Supreme Court, and in the meantime the open government group Reporters Committee for the Freedom of the Press has sought access to all materials in the clandestine litigation, including the company’s identity.

During a brief open hearing Wednesday, the chief judge of the U.S. District Court, Beryl Howell, pressed Goodhand to say if the grand jury Mueller had been using in the case remained active.

“It is continuing,” the prosecutor replied. “It’s continuing robustly.”

The fact the grand jury is continuing its work adds a new wrinkle to the Mueller probe, which Attorney General William Barr announced on Friday was finished.


Barr released a four-page summary explaining the special counsel had not found a conspiracy between Trump’s campaign and Russia to sway the election. Barr also noted that Mueller had not reached a conclusion on whether the president obstructed justice. The attorney general then made a separate judgment that the obstruction evidence did not rise to the level of a crime.

Additionally, the attorney general said Mueller had no more indictments — either to be released or under seal — in the case.

Mueller’s office in recent days has been handing off a series of its cases to federal prosecutors across the government as it closes up shop, including the mystery subpoena fight that’s been ongoing since last year.

EXPLAINER -- Everything to know about the Mueller Investigation
5:18
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/27/mueller-grand-jury-1238861

The U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, D.C., where Goodhand works is now leading the subpoena fight, as well as Mueller’s upcoming trial in November against longtime Trump associate Roger Stone and the eventual sentencing for former Trump campaign deputy Rick Gates.

Mueller spokesman Peter Carr declined to comment on the federal prosecutor’s statement in court about the active grand jury.

Theodore Boutrous, the lead attorney for the Reporters’ Committee, said he welcomed the revelation and the questions it raises about the direction of the Russia investigation that DOJ had otherwise announced was over.

“That to me is fascinating. It’s worth doing it for that,” he said.

Several legal experts offered their own theories about the Mueller grand jury’s status.

Samuel Buell, a former federal prosecutor now teaching law at Duke University, said the grand jury could still be meeting “on drain the swamp cases” akin to the one brought against former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Gates for failing to disclose foreign lobbying activity. He noted that one of the lead Mueller prosecutors in the Manafort-Gates case, Brandon Van Grack, is now leading a new DOJ unit assigned to enforcing that law.

Others said the grand jury’s continued presence could pose an ongoing headache for President Donald Trump, who since Sunday has misleadingly hyped Barr’s letter about the end of the Mueller probe as a complete exoneration.

"I worked with the prosecutor [Goodhand] in this matter,” said Gene Rossi, a former assistant U.S. attorney in Virginia. “He uses his words very carefully. The use of 'robustly' is not bluster or gratuitous. That word strongly suggests that the handoffs from Robert Mueller's office are alive and kicking, and that the Washington U.S. Attorney's office could be another troubling front for the president and the White House."

During Howell’s hearing Wednesday, the judge made it a point as she weighed the request to lift the curtain on the company’s identity to ascertain if the grand jury that’s been meeting since mid-2017 still had work to do.

“Transparency … when it comes to the judicial process is very important,” she said. “There should be no secret law.”

The mystery firm’s lawyers have argued the company should not be subject to a subpoena because it’s entirely foreign government-owned and complying with the subpoena would break the foreign country’s laws.

On Monday, the Supreme Court turned down the firm's appeal, leaving a pair of lower court decisions in place. The company is also currently subject to a $50,000-a-day legal fine as long as it refuses to turn over requested information. So far, it has piled up over $2 million in penalties.

In court Wednesday, Goodhand said the government still opposes the release of the foreign company’s name.

So did Brian Boone, a partner at Alston & Bird who is representing the firm. “My client would prefer to not have his identity be disclosed to the public,” Boone said.

Howell asked if Boone would explain why there’s still a need for secrecy.

“I’d prefer not to in a public a hearing," Boone replied.

The company’s lawyers then left from the courtroom before the hearing ended, skipping out on the arguments from the Reporters Committee and the federal government.

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/27/mueller-grand-jury-1238861
icon url

fuagf

03/27/19 10:02 PM

#305561 RE: dropdeadfred #305505

dropdeadfred, Trump Mueller "illegal" investigation "exonerated" me. Still lying. You must be very proud of your criminal, cretin of a president.
icon url

sortagreen

03/27/19 10:44 PM

#305566 RE: dropdeadfred #305505

Dead Dick... we haven't seen the Mueller report.