News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HymanMinsky

03/23/19 6:20 PM

#66083 RE: I-Glow #66082

still no link to the cancel fantasy :-(
icon url

Psychodman

03/23/19 6:35 PM

#66087 RE: I-Glow #66082

Post the link that says they WILL be cancelled and shareholders will receive no money in or out of CCAA?

Expectations? From the same Monitor that hasn’t even reviewed the value of contracts and licensing rights. Keep in mind all the monitors reports were released before the issue (motion) about contracts value was filed. If there was no validity to the motion, the court would have dismissed that motion. Oh I’m sure 100% MARK MY WORDS, there is considerable demand value for shareholders.
icon url

Psychodman

03/24/19 9:49 AM

#66112 RE: I-Glow #66082

The “false PREMISE” !!!

‘$1.64 being the top FMV value (distressed) by PWC’

PWC has not reviewed the contract and licensing rights value and with BIOAQ having the ability to collect on those contracts, then PWC has BIG problems.
If PWC did in fact send correspondence to FINRA regarding anything negative with BIOAQ shares it would have been premature.
I would suggest that if PWC sent anything negative concerning shares to FINRA, there is or will be a letter correcting that negative stance, they had taken.

I’d like to have a copy of the original PWC letter to FINRA.

I am baffled how value was assessed, a sale price could be determined when all of the contracts and licensing rights were not even “reviewed, audited or verified” according to the latest Monitors reports.

At first I had some doubts about actions or non-actions in this process,

Nearly everyday the PWC monitors reports and each item from their PWC page has been copied and saved as presented “that” specific date. Any changes made day by day, should be made with an amended copy provided for full transparency. The details will be in any changes made.