And no matter what anyone says, IMO, SHORTS HAVE/HAD A MAJOR IMPACT HERE. the charts and short list don't lie. I just provided the raw data and, IMO, the correlation is undeniable they had an effect on share price with this low float.
Also, when there are a VERY LARGE NUMBER of shares wrapped up in long hands, the short position matters as the trade-able float is much smaller.
At the end of the day, I agree going forward shorts wont be a problem. I believe once on Nasdaq, our true value will shine and it would be a huge gamble to short and NOT BELIEVE we will have progress with our integrations and partnerships. Shorts are doubting they are real, but maybe they need more DD. The institutions dropped millions of dollars after their DD. Regardless of what price the institutions end up giving, DOES ANYONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND THINK THEY ARE DISHING OUT MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO A COMPANY WHO DOESN'T HAVE REAL PARTNERSHIPS AND REVENUE CREATION IN THEIR FUTURE??? I promise the Institution DD is stronger than the ihub flipper and shorter ;)
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
