the problem imo is known but not appreciated..
too many weaker sharepricedescisions have made the stock vulnerable. its imo constantly ' played'.
its allways difficult to prove that beyond a doubt..but with a bit of open mindness and following some intraday movements and bid and asks.. it isnt that difficult to at least assume people and bidders and asks throw in volume and no volume on strange moments
for instance..stock trades 1,18 no volume _ not much ASK to go trough 1,2 barrier - still NO ONE wants to buy -or SELL -
then with a shareprice 1,18 suddenly it is put back to 1,14 with 1 k or something like that ,nobody would sell this way -or you're the one allways losing money-
than in the end suddenly 1,15 200k in various 10ks.
if it was a fixed buy or sale.this would have gone 1 ONE time.
typical thing is that broker is still -the sameseller and buyer-
imo someone is hanging on this one,for a long time and keeping it where he wants it to be..
as long as management dont start to PR more often,this is gonna be a long and not forefilling ride..
I know the possibilities, but I also know the farmaceutical way of vanishing new opportunities as long as they dont want it to succeed.
Management imo is therefore not too clever in some deals and should inform their sharholders way more often and transparanter than it does till now.
I recently spoke/mailed mr Newberry.
It was an intersting and finally more honest open mailconversation..where mr Newberry acnowledged my points,he gave some better answers and reasons for some deals..but allthough slightly more stisfied with his answers and his acceptance and commendment for my view..I really hope they start to understand the way the market works..and give more PR to their shareholders and a more open view of weaknesses and opportunities.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
