News Focus
News Focus
icon url

rsh

03/10/19 1:01 PM

#15724 RE: Interestking #15723

Yes, and just think - Fleming started out with something that worked! HYSR did not! Thus, I think your timeline is way too short!
icon url

Cid Vicious

03/13/19 12:32 PM

#15733 RE: Interestking #15723

Justify it any way you like. Your hopium does not supersede the lack of delivery and transparency of H2 output by HYSR. I just want measured evidence that they are able to produce standard operational volumes. Its nothing personal to you guys at all. My sentiment is towards HYSR in where they do not supplement the real information investors want to know. It has been directly communicated many times through out the years. Despite the ongoing changes in the idea of what it is HYSR is trying to deliver has changed many times frustrating previous investors, but also confusing the new investors.

Bottom line, HSYR needs to show H2 output over a measured period of time to quantify true results at minimum. Saying it is stable or not that the catalyst is actively operating is not sufficient enough. Its obvious they are skirting around why anyone would want to invest at all.

Would you agree that this would be helpful information to aid in your decision to invest? If not then explain why it would not be of significance.