Replies to post #49472 on Vystar Corp (VYST)

[BigBadWolf]

completely agreed if not PR'd then a shareholder update explaining said on OTC Markets linking the filing is allowable

I will say this regardless if it some may not like it. Yesterdays late day amazing VYST response to the EMA bs lawsuit action should've been PR'd by VYST.

And my reason for saying so is simple, it doesn't matter how many educated investors took the time to seek out the VYST pacer filing and see their amazing 25 pages worth of professionally compiled evidence against EMA...the problem with VYST not deeming their legal response as a PR worthy material event is simply that a small percentage of the market is too lazy to do any due diligence, and all they saw being discussed since around 11pm last night was VYST's pacer response...and without VYST news released on the matter putting it in "laymans" terms so to speak, there's always gonna be a few who sell whenever they see lawsuit being discussed no matter the facts, and especially in the absence of any official news.

I personally don't care that VYST didn't see fit to PR their response...but that's part of why some started selling this morning...and of course then other impatient hands and manipulators joined them.

The good thing for the patient VYST longs is that we know the truth of VYST's legal response, and understand that news on what they're going to do with EMA is probably being saved for after the EMA case gets dismissed!

And we have much bigger news coming anyways, in the form of the Rotmans acquisition 8k pending...and all of this weeks sellers will soon be sorry the moment the Rotmans acquisition hits!

[magikalalpha]

You can't pr something in adjudication.

[investtoski]

do you have a link to the VYST response? Looks like you need an account on pacer to view.

[InItForMoney]

My only regret is not getting in earlier and not having more money to invest! Thanks for all your work and your continued devotion to the truth Doogs!