I believe there are few on this particular board that are arbitrarily posting negative info or harmful sentiment to the company.
It is more simply a question of further accountability from a CEO whose initial announcements have proven flawed. Ultimately, it is a simple discussion: Was there intent to mislead investors, or was it simply a poorly executed business deal whereby BizRight gained distribution and exposure without having to forfeit revenue brought forth by Sugarmade's logistical intervention?
I hope that it turns out to be the latter. Not that I want the CEO making foolish business dealings, but I would rather he make a mistake and own it than to try to double cross shareholders.
If it is simply timing of BizRight/BZRTH deal, then a further question is that once these transactions complete will Sugarmade retain revenue in addition to shared valuation of company from the inception of dealings relative to shares and monetary compensation for agreements and acquisitions.
You see, not negative, just a few simple questions.