News Focus
News Focus
icon url

fuagf

02/27/19 4:19 AM

#302766 RE: ForReal #302749

ForReal, 5point2 .. 'Paid to continue their genocide' .. that is as any stupid, vicious misrepresentation as any ..
Margaret Sangster was a courageous women who fought asshole men as you to her grave .. excerpts .

"New progressive abortion push is barbaric. Procedures straight out of the islamic state or north korean prison camps.
P - Not really. Just a continuous progression of what Margaret Sanger started in 1922. You should do a little
study of her and her beliefs. Then you can appreciate how we got to where we are with regard to infanticide.
"

[...]

In A Plan for Peace, an essay in the April 1932 issue of Birth Control Review, Sanger proposed a congressional department to address population problems. She recommended that immigration exclude those "whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race," and that sterilization and segregations be applied to those with incurable, hereditary, disabilities.

Sanger saw birth control as a means to prevent "dysgenic" children from being born into a disadvantaged life, and dismissed "positive eugenics" (which promoted greater fertility for the "fitter" upper classes) as impractical. Though many leaders in the negative eugenics movement were calling for active euthanasia of the "unfit," Sanger spoke out against such methods. She believed that women with the power and knowledge of birth control were in the best position to produce "fit" children. She rejected any type of eugenics that would take control out of the hands of those actually giving birth.

Sanger claimed that birth control advocates and eugenics advocates shared a common goal of "assisting the race toward the elimination of the 'unfit'". While Sanger supported negative eugenics, she asserted that eugenics alone was not sufficient, and that birth control was essential to achieve that goal.

Taking sharp issue in plain words with certain other eugenicists, however, Margaret Sanger completely rejected the idea of killing the unfit, expressly denouncing euthanasia as a eugenics tool. In Pivot of Civilization Sanger wrote, "Nor do we believe that the community could or should send to the lethal chamber the defective progeny resulting from irresponsible and unintelligent breeding." Sanger denounced the agressive and lethal Nazi eugenics program.

September 2011 - https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=67517098

You are wrong on Sanger.

See also:

The Demonizing of Margaret Sanger
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147138786