News Focus
News Focus
icon url

HoldenWalker99

02/26/19 1:16 PM

#508315 RE: YanksGhost #508314

It's a good post because it includes citations from the law supporting all of his points... compared to your reply which is just more opinion on what you want to happen.
icon url

HoldenWalker99

02/26/19 1:18 PM

#508317 RE: YanksGhost #508314

I can tell that you're frustrated. You've made more than 100% on your common play. Sell and buy preferred and ride out the rest of reform with a winner. You're going to kick yourself when common end up around $2-3.
icon url

kthomp19

02/26/19 1:20 PM

#508319 RE: YanksGhost #508314

The unmistakable truth is that FHFA abided critical under-capitalization for 10 years but, suddenly now, a provision in HERA requires properly defined "core capital" to be present?



The justification for each FHFA director to not set capital standards has been that the companies are in conservatorship. This would all go out the window once the companies are released.

Calabria also seems much more willing than his predecessors to actually fulfill all his obligations under HERA. HERA is his baby; he has said many times that he helped draft it and that any time he does something, he will look at the statute first.

Short version: I believe all other FHFA directors have been violating HERA by not setting binding capital standards, and that Calabria will not continue that trend.
icon url

Guido2

02/26/19 1:35 PM

#508331 RE: YanksGhost #508314

It's a great post because others have consumed antidote to the Moelis Kool-Aid. They need to stand together and be cheerleaders to each other's posts.

icon url

Donotunderstand

02/26/19 1:44 PM

#508340 RE: YanksGhost #508314

that may be 4617 (f)