InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

I_luv_cydy

02/10/19 12:18 AM

#35742 RE: trding #35727

Trding--- what about mentioning ZERO Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in any trial?
I know you already have a list of 10.
icon url

I_luv_cydy

02/10/19 12:19 AM

#35743 RE: trding #35727

Oops---MY BAD. I just saw #3 covering safety. Great job trding!!
icon url

eetrog

02/12/19 1:48 PM

#36035 RE: trding #35727

If this reflect the quality of your research and analysis here, I am not surprised about your sentiment and reaction to my wake up call.

1) But not safety, which just got rejection once again

2) Current AS is not good enough to complete it

3) It is very safe, yes.

4) Not even company dares to project $1BB revenues

5) Partnership: NO TALKS, they are just PLANNING it

6) If you have enough cash, you may start it. Takes 1-2 years.

7) RP is NOT #1 ranked Oncologist, he just monetizes his research now

8) Maybe, it is still speculation

9) More cash requirements

10) Why did they ever stopped this? GvHD was their tiny little money maker they abandoned. No cash, the usual excuse.

Most important for retail: Partnership: NO TALKS, they are just PLANNING it

You guys need a lot of luck
icon url

JA2626

02/19/19 4:53 PM

#36934 RE: trding #35727

i totally agree ....great science ...terrible financing ...people and companies trading everyday so they can make one penny per trade , what a joke ....huge speed bump needs to be demolished let's get into the real M&A game with real partners please