News Focus
News Focus
icon url

jwerneck

02/07/19 6:36 PM

#558199 RE: AZCowboy #558197

“Matters relevant to “Washington Mutual Capital Trust 2001” (the “PIERs Trust”), the entity that issued the so-called PIERs securities, were litigated extensively in connection with the confirmation proceedings related to the Plan that was ultimately approved by the Bankruptcy Court. Since the Effective Date, claimants whose claims against the estate relate to such securities have received distributions from the estate in accordance with the terms of the Plan (assuming that such claimant submitted required documentation and releases in order to be eligible for any such distribution). Apart from such distributions, including distributions in the future (if any), the PIERs Trust does not represent a source of value for future distributions, if any.”

What about the Posit?
icon url

JB3136

02/07/19 6:37 PM

#558200 RE: AZCowboy #558197

AZ if there will not be any additional LTI's Issued as you suggest, then wouldn't that mean escrows will end up with zip?

icon url

t1215s

02/07/19 7:00 PM

#558211 RE: AZCowboy #558197

One must think what!!! wazzzzzzzz accomplished/accumated in alllllll this time and by whom and who knew, I believe I might have said who a very long time ago more than a few times IMHO.;-)

GLTA Ts
icon url

LuckyPanda

02/07/19 8:56 PM

#558245 RE: AZCowboy #558197

AZ, yes it is very shameful..but I cannot ignore the language they are using to deny "off books" assets in 18 at this time. It seems that it will be pretty hard to back off those denials if the "off book" ABS returns do show up after PIERS payoff.

How will they legally justify the backoff of the denials? This really concerns me.