One cannot possibly determine that "there is no 75/25 to the end" from the quoted language.
The 75/25 to the end is provided for in the plan. And the quoted language simply says that distributions will be made in accordance with the plan.
And if there is to be any distribution made by the LT to current escrow holders, the LT will first issue LTIs to escrow holders in advance of that distribution. This has been clearly stated by the LT on a number of occassions.
I know that many here value your analysis. I do not. I have always found it to be the worst type of conjecture based on an irrational and highly selective reading of documents, resulting in nonsense conclusions, such as the assertion that the NOLs disappeared at the time of the merger, which is 100% demonstrably untrue.
You've been warning us? You have been the leading billions cheerleader.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
