Chuckle, this point, "But here’s the catch: Any wall would be built a mile or so inland from the border. Many of those attempting to immigrate are Central Americans seeking asylum. To petition for asylum, a person needs to be on U.S. soil under current law. So in theory, immigrants could cross the border and file a legally valid petition for asylum before reaching Trump’s wall. The incentive would still exist, and so would the visa overstays."
"“The lawless state of our southern border is a threat to the safety, security and financial well-being of all Americans. We have a moral duty to create an immigration system that protects the lives and jobs of our citizens.”"
is a good one to keep in mind.
Noted: The WAPO fact check gave credit to Trump where credit was due. It was very fair, while again making indisputably clear that untruths of misrepresentation (including claiming credit where he deserves none), and exaggeration, and downright lies still predominate in any Trump discourse. Even so far as to taint his State of Union address to the point to reaffirm the fact that little Trump says can ever be trusted. And this dishonesty of Trump's (and those who wrote his SoU) is not openly condemned by the GOP.
In conclusion it is clear, to this point, that images as yours
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
