Replies to post #12095 on Vystar Corp (VYST)

[WHIP THE HORSE]

Sterling, I actually like your calculations better than mine, thank you

[Stock Logics]

I am in no rush! I will hold post $4 per share!

$VYST

[trademax42]

Wow!!! Huge fundamental valuations by stervc. I'm willing to wait it out.

Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!

imho only.

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[winnaar123]

Best post of the day!

[mikeski74]

That’s why I just grabbed another $500

[cjstocksup]

Someone with a lot of coins needs to use them on this post# 12095 I am replying to by Sterling. VYST PPS valuation $32.32. This is 100% great VYST DD! Sellers below massive dollars ahead have not done any DD on the companies under VYST already and then add in Rotmans furniture. The Rotman family own them all! Just look at all the rubber companies I place DD her eon daily. They all trade at $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 as our closest competitors and that is a small portion of Vystar!

WHIP THE HORSE, Significant with that VYST valuation thought...

Respectfully, it's not that easy. There are more variables that must be considered before a fundamental assessment could be given for a $1 Billion valuation consideration.

First, I think it's important to know that the $1 billion should be considered speculative and not actual. Please, everyone needs to understand that VYST is not going to be a $1 Billion company anytime soon if such ever manifests into a reality.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[Stock Logics]

MUST READ POST HERE FOLKS:

$VYST

[doogdilinger]

Another MASSIVE valuation metrics post, thanks a million Sterling, you sir are a ROCK STAR and it's an honor to be accumulating this soon to be multi-month MONSTA with you!!!

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling

[cjstocksup]

Must read VYST valuation of $32.32. Rotmans furniture just had their competitor bought out by Buffet's son. We know our 3 competitors have $55.00, $65.00 and $75.00 PPS on the big boards. Your valuation of $32.32 is very real! Rotmans has already sold over 1 billion dollars in merchandise. Now look at the huge growth we have done just in the past year.

Something that is actual is the over $35 million in Revenues for Rotmans. The vision they have to become a $1 billion company will take a long while before such would even exist to mature (I think). However, I will create the valuation as if the stars were to somehow align to consider if $1 Billion in Revenues was generated by VYST so that you can understand how such would make VYST worth more than the $4.00 per share amount that you posted. I will use the certain variables within the post below with using the Substitution Property:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=146166501

$1,000,000,000 Revenues x .19 Net Profit Margin = $190,000,000 Net Income

$190,000,000 Net Income + $31,319,398 Tax NOL = $221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income

$221,319,398 Adjusted Net Income ÷ 250,000,000 (OS) = .885 EPS

.885 EPS x 36.53 PE Ratio = $32.32 Per Share Net Valuation

I think this is the reason why VYST believes that they can get to the NASDAQ without doing a reverse split. This is what I believe the management team for VYST is seeing which is the reason for them to buyback up to 250 Million shares which is approximately half of their Outstanding Shares (OS). Just think... even if I am half right or a quarter right or so, we are still talking about some levels substantially higher than where we're at now.

So, in closing, I do believe that the acquisition of Rotmans that was indicated within their last 10-Q that's scheduled to close around mid-February could position VYST to meeting the $4.00 per share minimum bid requirement for 30 consecutive days for the NASDAQ. However, the $32.32 per share valuation, if ever achieved, would take a good while later.

v/r
Sterling