Replies to post #1949 on Celexus Inc. (fka CXUS)

[jdcpa1]

I specifically asked the board about this yesterday and was crucified. The press release from last fall says reverse split clearly. If that's not the case then why did they not put something out to clarify? Or can you send us the link to refute the news they actually put out?

[PepsiMan]

Thank you for clarifying that my friend!

They were contacted on that and said it was a misprint... they meant to say "reverse Merger" not reverse split. This came from D. James. The merger they were referencing was of Cellexus... which we now see is legit per last news..as they are changing the name to Cellexus and also changing the symbol. With this SS and control block that has changed hands...there is zero need for an RS.

$TLPY


PEPSI

[mick]

Thank You Lots/ Buyer of $TLPY shell MEANT REVERSE MERGER , NOT REVERSE SPLIT/

RE;
They were contacted on that and said it was a misprint...
they meant to say "reverse Merger" not reverse split.

This came from D. James.
The merger they were referencing was of Cellexus
... which we now see is legit per last news
...as they are changing the name to Cellexus and also changing the symbol.

With this SS and control block that has changed hands

...there is zero need for an RS.

[mick]

i beLieve this, it happens/ $TLPY --- MGMT ?????

[choctaw]

thanks