Replies to post #216399 on Mike Lindell Media Corp (MLMC)

[Sentinel]

pimpin....Your arguments cut both ways. You have no proof that the posters you disagree with are actually wrong, or that they don't hold a position in this stock. The "positive posters" say the same thing over and over again as well, so why should it work any different for them? The future is built on the past, so the past is definitely relevant. To ignore it is to stick ones head in the sand, and hide from factors which may well determine the future you so desperately want to believe in..

[itrade4profit2]

So let me say this about the "bus tour"....

(1) I am certainly not the only poster who believes that idea to be a bad one and ill conceived.

(2) clearly there has been some problems with some dates although most have gone off as scheduled.

(3) If you are in the business of marketing your company and trying to garner a return for your shareholders and you are taking a cross-country tour in an attempt to raise awareness of your brand....and you are photographing these events and providing footage via podcasts etc....

Then....you would clearly from a strict marketing standpoint want to take footage of large crowds of people interacting and being involved with the "tour"....

I have not seen this (as a whole)....

Since when are IF THEN arguments not acceptable and if my logic is flawed in this regard then show me where it is wrong....yes...agreed that not all sites have met with small crowds....however the over-all impression from the photos and record avialable on this issue.....sorry, not very successful...and then lets also add into the mix the percentage of game players who will sign-up for subscriptions versus the number of individuals who are there for a chance to win the prize!

You are very welcome to engage in a great debate....

[anywho9090]

Thats not just your opinion... may I claim it as mine too! Well said!

I came to this board to listen and learn... (LOL I won't tell you what I have learned I am sure any honest hearted individual has learned the same thing.) I thought I was entering a room where I would hear pros and cons from people who cared about the success of GnF, people who are 'invested' in the success of the company. I also understand that EVERY word posted on this board is to be considered lightly in determining my imvestment moves. But there are some like Agent and others who do some deep diligence and share their research and I appreciate that very much. But I also realize as we all should that it is an open room and anyone can enter and say as they please. And if this was a literal room I would walk away from uninvested naysayers and refuse to 'discuss' (yeah right... discuss) with individuals who seem just bent on jabbing at others and causing one's blood to boil. But I am not in a literal room... I am on a message board so instead of walking away I put such ones on 'ignore'. Unfortunately so many have entered the 'room' that my 5 iggies are filled. And no I will not at this point purchase the right to put more on ignore. I will have to be content to scroll down the list and look for ones that post information that is helpful, insighful and as honest as can be expected on an anonymous message board and read those only! I will not suggest anyone else do the same... hmmmm.

Phew! I feel better! LOL... but go ahead I know your lurking out there... go ahead, retort and try and make me feel 'less better.'


-anywho