Replies to post #554946 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[LuckyPanda]

I didnt make up the rules. I speculated just like everyone else picking their horses. But it looks like if those stock options around $40 are to be worth anything, 75/25 likely will not apply to bankruptcy remote assets. Again, I'm not trying to argue with anyone else. Just my opinion. I think the final safe harbor return to the estate will be between $50B and $100B... so those $40 options arent worth anything if 75/25 apllied to everything.


I've always said years ago that I suspected 75/25 does not apply to everything. Otherwise, there wouldnt have been multiple classes of escrow markers. They would have just made one and split the one class of markers 75/25.

Just my opinion based on my logic. So go easy on the hate replies. Not trying to rain on anyone's parade. Just my interpretation of the clues...

[goodietime]

"Many people will be highly upset if your right about the 75/25,"

I have been on this and the 'other Board' for many years now.
From the very beginning I was under the thought that it was/is 75/25. I believe from what I read that 'everybody' was in agreement.
It has only been in the last few years that the P's get par common gets the rest came about.

Does anyone know when these ' P's get par common gets the rest' theories first started to appear?

Like I said, the theory looks 'recent', in terms of how long this has been going on.