News Focus
News Focus
icon url

TheDane

01/11/19 8:44 AM

#253866 RE: NickAidenNY #253862

Galera? That’s something that at least makes sense. You have evidence of this?

Hear that Leo? Get on top of this.
icon url

kfcyahoo

01/11/19 9:26 AM

#253870 RE: NickAidenNY #253862

"What everyone is missing is the real connecting of the dots. It’s quite unfortunate IPIX is on the OTC. It has given a private company the ability to try and destroy their competitor with means of OTC tricks and some proxies. Do some DD, do some tech savvy snoops and you’ll be able to see why the negative interest exists here and why the “non shareholders” know so much about the science of two drugs looking for the same wide open market. It’s pretty simple."

I don't know if it's unfortunate(in managements mind) to be on the otc. The quote below by the cfo/ceo was made over 5 years ago.

"As such, we have shifted our development strategy with our anti-psoriasis drug, Prurisol, to forego the planned Proof-of-Concept trial overseas and have already begun preparing the regulatory paperwork for the Food and Drug Administration to initiate a larger-scale, Phase 2/3 multi-center trial. The adjustment will save us hundreds of thousands of dollars and months of time that will now be better served to position us to potentially have up to five clinical trials ongoing in 2014. This acquisition dovetails very nicely in our goals to continue to build shareholder value and uplist to a senior exchange in the near future."

ph 2/3 P trial- missed it that much
5 clinical trials in 2014- missed it that much
uplist to a senior exchange in the near future- missed by a mile. There's always tomorrow!
icon url

CallMeCrazy

01/11/19 9:29 AM

#253872 RE: NickAidenNY #253862

I agree with you. Here's why.

According to Future Medicine, annual costs associated with treating all types of mucositis in approximately 522,000 patients annually total $13.23 billion.

Galera has managed to raise over $250 million in the last six years, including $150 million in equity and royalty deals ($80 million which was based on future sales of CG4419) about three months ago. Galera has rallied plenty of support from venture capital, with financing partners including Clarus Ventures, Adage Capital Management, Novartis Venture Fund and more.


In the Galera trial, treatment with GC4419 in the higher cisplatin group reduced the relative incidence of SOM by 41% compared to placebo in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) population. In the ITT – IMRT (intensity-modulated radiation therapy) population, the relative incidence of SOM decreased by 39% versus placebo.

In the IPIX trial, treatment with Brilacidin in the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population reduced the relative incidence of SOM by 65.0% compared to placebo. In the Per Protocol population, the relative incidence of SOM decreased by 80.3% compared to placebo

An oral therapy can be a double-edged sword. One, it can have a competitive edge as oral drugs are the preferred method of administration for patients compared to laying there while the drug slowly drips through an IV. To that point, an oral drug is far more convenient, with administration available in an array of settings compared to IV. It also less expensive, likely making it the preferred method of not only insurance companies, but also doctors writing the prescriptions.


https://www.baystreet.ca/stockstowatch/5021/A-Look-at-New-Oral-Mucositis-Drugs-Galera-Therapeutics-Capital-Raise-Points-to-Innovation-Pharmaceuticals-Being-Grossly-Undervalued

It appears that B-OM is much more effective than GC4419 and B-OM's method of delivery is preferred by patients, doctors, and insurance companies in a market valued in the billion$ with no FDA approved drug. I consider this sufficient motivation for some investors in GC4419 to engage in nefarious acts aimed at eliminating an obviously, superior competitor.

Message in reply to:

What everyone is missing is the real connecting of the dots. It’s quite unfortunate IPIX is on the OTC. It has given a private company the ability to try and destroy their competitor with means of OTC tricks and some proxies. Do some DD, do some tech savvy snoops and you’ll be able to see why the negative interest exists here and why the “non shareholders” know so much about the science of two drugs looking for the same wide open market. It’s pretty simple.
icon url

zandant

01/11/19 10:40 AM

#253875 RE: NickAidenNY #253862

Really? Why would they waste their time when the company is destroying itself internally with incompetent management.