Replies to post #28422 on Phoenix Associates Land Syndicate (fka PBLSQ)

[beerthirty]

My question was an easy one, which IR guy sent you to ihub?

[Imirish]

Mr.Pastorious

u are right on target... keep up the work, there is something very wrong with this stock/company.... not everyone here is a koolaide drinker and a long time ago... I questioned the florida pump and dumpers, mostly gone... the managements motives with some others.... don't worry about the sunshiners, because they are missing the point.... as to mulshine, he sees naked shorts in every mismanaged company... nice guy, means well, very smart for sure, but getting anything of real value there is a waste of time.... just an opinion of course...follow the selling/seller/money/and amount of shares sold... that is the key.... some of us think we have a idea on the real story... but we will dig for sure... all the above is in my opinion only...

Imirish...

[Russian-Trader]

Which one would you like to discuss first? Please provide the facts that you have based your conclusions on though.

[tedwitt]

Most likely because we have re-hashed every scenario we can think of and then we re-hashed it. We have beaten so many horses here that they are piled up like cordwood. In all seriousness the only thing left to do is continue to be vigilant with our DD and share the results and wait some more. I think management would use this time wisely by buying back shares and begin to keep its shareholders abreast of what is going on now that we will not be evicted from the pit.

Now see the other side of the legal situation. There are three suits if I am not mistaken. That could result in three good PR’s. Remember the rise to .05 on the news of closing some legal dispute?

You want to discus “inconsistencies”?

1) OK, what pinkie that is actually screwing their shareholders would ever send a check for their certs?
2) What pinkie scam would invite investors to drop in?
3) What pinkie scam actually buys their stock back instead of R/S and flood again?
4) What pinkie scam would publish an organizational sheet like that?
5) What kind of company owners would sell their companies to PBLS for preferred shares of a company that will not be around in 5 years?
6) What pinkie scam would tell their investors that ProGass income will fall short in the 4th Q07 due to low NatGas prices and still expects to gross $81 million?

I am not happy with all of what has happened but these are the “inconsistencies” that do not add up that continue to keep my interest.

If the court day was a “D-Day” for the company and they managed to scrape by then in my mind there are several issues that can provide good PR’s
1) Concluding legal disputes
2) Packaging out WY & NV in a drilling JV
3) Increased pit production
4) Share structure
5) Details on buy back completion
6) Profit details on BestJets engine contract (PS GE does not deal with scams)
7) Update on construction activities
8) ProGas one year later
9) FORM 10
10) All the other stuff that happens

[Time To Roll]

I am done discussing why I am here, why I bought the stock, who sent me here, etc. Why don't we discuss the glaring inconsistancies I brought up?



Your posts say it all in my opinion, if all you require is .012 so that you can go away; I think you will be gone very soon. You only engage in negative speculation. I am willing to consider both sides, however, you are a one sided coin.