Again with your exaggerations. Is there any particular reason you are willing to extend these courtesies to GTCB but every other stock in the universe is, in your opinion, a scam, or at least a good short candidate?
Since the quoted paragraph below refers to costs associated with herd expansion comparative to the 3rd quarter of 2005, is it at all possible you are jumping the gun by indicating an actual expansion occured during the 3rd quarter of 2006, so no need to be concerned?
For that matter, it does not even directly reference an actual expansion at all in 2006, only that the costs associated with an expansion (performed whenever) increased from the 3rd quarter of 2005. Maybe new construction?
"Cost of revenue...
...The costs associated with the Merrimack program are expensed as incurred. The increase in cost of revenue is primarily the result of the costs associated with the Merrimack program for herd expansion and product manufacturing."
Do you have any idea how common that statement is in GTC filings throughout the years?
Out. If I want cheers for a stock I own I will talk to my kid. Until then I will observe GTCB without the opinionated, yet impressive, input from the overextended. As far as the dewphiles, I would beware. A good reference is a consistent one.
Very disappointed. I expected no nonsense conversations here, not more of the same.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
