Hi Bill:
Please explain why the insistence on an unpaid third party objective testing at arm's length by a reputable laboratory using state of the art industry standard protocols?
For example, the Canadian national government has a very fine electronics testing laboratory that does contract work and reports what they tested, what standards were used, what protocol was used, how the testing approximated real world conditions, etc. I am certain that there are independent American testing laboratories available to do the same high quality evaluations for a fee. I have no inherent bias against a legitimate company paying to have a product tested and certified by a qualified laboratory as long as the conditions approach the real world and the protocol meets current state of the art parameters in the industry. That is just IMHO.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
