Replies to post #545841 on Mr Cooper Group Inc fka COOP

[WAMUSHAMU]

Guess the phone call she made to Judge Sleet had an effect

[jerrylev]

It is good news but I see nothing that says that the experts are right because we all expect this sooner or later.

So the judge ordered that all claims are dismissed and WMILT is free to distribute the money in the dispute reserve. Which means that 40M is now free to be distributed. And potentially all remaining COOP shares held in the reserve will be also distributed. Then the Escrow CUSIP will be deleted once and for all and this will conclude all discussions about its meaning. But don't worry we will get LTI instead.

So my guess now is that PIERS will be paid in Feb along with escrow getting paid with 40M first. Between now and Feb, escrow will receive LTI for 40M with the rest sent out at a later date.

Now in your post, you now concede that the judge ruled the whole thing. And POR 7 is her most important ruling. There is nothing that is outside POR 7 and WMILT. End of story.

[stevo321]

Can someone tell what this means,
so I can know whether or not I should
be mad at judge Mary.

[BBANBOB]

what about the abeyance?

and is that signed yet

[JusticeWillWin]

Oh ron, it is only a PROPOSED order (see page 45/48), dated 08/30/2018 and not signed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

<- AZ is Right ->

THMFW Ruled from the Bench.

PDF 48/48. Other Message Boarders; YOU ONLY NEED TO READ ONE PAGE. Read More, Post Less.

www.kccllc.net/wamu/document/0812229180830000000000001



Thank You AZ.


The Stay is OFF.


HLCE is ON,
Ron

[BigBang]

I don’t see Walrath’s signature anywhere on this document. The date of filing is shown as 8/30/2018, the date the LT filed the motion that was heard on 10/16/2018. The last attached document, signed by a district judge, is signed in June, 2018. Where is Walrath’s signature on her bench order?

[Donotunderstand]

The final page is not signed --- and this was August?

(only signature is June 2018)

as I understand it the plaintiffs - us - would submit a motion for signature

no signature -- it is only the motion as drafted - not ruled on
?