News Focus
News Focus
icon url

Howzie

11/01/06 2:03 PM

#121118 RE: dragon52 #121115

No, in fact it would be tougher to trade there.
icon url

gdb81

11/01/06 2:05 PM

#121121 RE: dragon52 #121115

LOL

Yes, NASDAQ requires the same documentation as the OTC BB.

They also require 3-4 MMs, which is 3-4 more than you currently have.

You'll be lucky if anyone is dumb enough to take the jump, the odds that more than one will are abyssimal.

You can only piggyback after 30 days, which means at minimum a month before this even sees the OTC

I doubt you'll meet the market value requirements either way.
icon url

tradeforgains

11/01/06 2:40 PM

#121147 RE: dragon52 #121115

Dragon-since it is going to neither, that's a meaningless question, isn't it?
icon url

Hunter6110

11/01/06 3:14 PM

#121185 RE: dragon52 #121115

Still dreaming of the nasdaq , that's just way to funny....LMAO
icon url

janice shell

11/01/06 8:21 PM

#121393 RE: dragon52 #121115

do you think nasdaq needs a 15c2-11?

Yes, actually. After all these years you don't even know THAT? And until an MM signs off on a Form 211, CSHD will trade on the Greys.