InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

petemantx

10/29/18 3:29 PM

#246661 RE: lousy engineer #246660

Does anyone really think Leo would face the possible charges of neglecting his fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders by doing something underhanded w/ the MFO if it indeed has a family member employed?

If possibly true, which I doubt,it would give me a greater belief that Leo knows the end result is going to be very good for investors as at his stage of life a major lawsuit against him and his entire net worth is out of the question.

More FUD is my impression, but that is strictly my opinion.
icon url

groton68

10/29/18 4:00 PM

#246665 RE: lousy engineer #246660

Cronyism? He made it up.
icon url

scottsmith

10/29/18 4:02 PM

#246666 RE: lousy engineer #246660

Neither myself nor my elite subscriber alleged anything. Simply bringing certain facts to the board’s attention as I know many like to “connect the dots” and “follow the bread crumbs”.