Does anyone really think Leo would face the possible charges of neglecting his fiduciary responsibilities to shareholders by doing something underhanded w/ the MFO if it indeed has a family member employed?
If possibly true, which I doubt,it would give me a greater belief that Leo knows the end result is going to be very good for investors as at his stage of life a major lawsuit against him and his entire net worth is out of the question.
More FUD is my impression, but that is strictly my opinion.
Neither myself nor my elite subscriber alleged anything. Simply bringing certain facts to the board’s attention as I know many like to “connect the dots” and “follow the bread crumbs”.