hotmeat, you said cut and pasted FACTS. This is so true. What proves facts in this case is explaining the last link in chain to prove ownership. This also explains why this is not discussed because it all leads back to investors who signed timely releases by 3/2012.
Then the the court made the ownership change law when the court signed this change into law on the Effective Date of 3/19/2012 cancelling out all former preferred and common prospectuses along with all associated documents.
Here is another posit that cannot be explained here.
If an investor signed timely releases by 3/2012, this made the investor an owner of the Estate. That means if you received markers in your account you are party to and own whatever shows in your account which would be preferred, common or a combination of both. The investor then is a party to the ownership change that happened on the Effective Date of 3/19/2012 which is controlled by the Delaware Federal Bankrupcty Court and yes, certain assets are protected from creditors BUT the power of the court controls ownership.
Now a question. If the powers of the court do NOT control ownership of what the investor signed, then it would seem the investor owns nothing as the investor signed releases. Or, how is ownership explained since the investor signed releases and all preferred and common prospectuses were cancelled along with ALL associated documents on the Effective Date of 3/19/2012?
It seems to me, if one expects to follow the court procedures but this mysterious pile hidden away somewhere has a specific name on that and that is NOT part of the bankruptcy process. Now please try to explain the last link in title that proves ownership into these mysterious monies that have a specific name on them BUT are not part of the court process? Many here would like a clear, concise explanation to this issue!
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
